Picture this: You’re in a staff meeting, and a colleague serves up the great idea you expressed during an earlier brainstorm as her own. You want so desperately to raise your hand and say, “Um, excuse me? That was MY idea.”

Perhaps this is because, of all the ideas we generate during say, a [...]]]>

Picture this: You’re in a staff meeting, and a colleague serves up the great idea you expressed during an earlier brainstorm as her own. You want so desperately to raise your hand and say, “Um, excuse me? That was MY idea.”

Think of inventors. Songwriters. Visual artists. WRITERS. Don’t you wish you would have thought of Post-Its®? Wrote “Jingle Bells?” Developed the storyline for the “Twilight” series? (That would be 3M, James Lord Pierpont, and Stephenie Meyer, respectively.) The medium for idea sharing may vary, but it all comes back to the creative process. When the result of that process generates a masterpiece, creators naturally want (and deserve) credit.

On Jan. 18, several major Internet sites blacked out their content for users in protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), and predictions were flying that another major blackout was planned for Jan. 23. The latter blackout didn’t pan out as predicted, but the Jan. 18 blackout made people pay attention to the issue. Seems a good time to revisit what’s both appropriate and required in giving credit in PR communications.

As you draft that brochure or conceive a campaign tagline, keep in mind that Plagiarism.org lists the following as conditions for committing plagiarism:

1)      Turning in someone else’s work as your own

2)      Copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit

3)      Failing to put a quotation in quotation marks

4)      Giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation

5)      Changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit

6)      Copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not

Similarly, citing your work — and doing so completely — is the responsibility of all communicators. If your heart is where it should be (directing readers to the original source for more information), then there’s really no excuse for sloppy citations. Dig deep, look up the exact page online, do whatever is required so that you can feel good about what you’ve contributed to the process.

Photo courtesy of acf_windy on Flickr

When we first posted about the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) blackout protest scheduled for January 23, we had no idea that Wikipedia and Reddit (which had planned a January 18 blackout protest) would persuade other sites to join their effort yesterday. According to the Los Angeles Times, more [...]]]>

Photo courtesy of acf_windy on Flickr

When we first posted about the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) blackout protest scheduled for January 23, we had no idea that Wikipedia and Reddit (which had planned a January 18 blackout protest) would persuade other sites to join their effort yesterday. According to the Los Angeles Times, more than 10,000 sites participated in the SOPA protest by either making their sites inaccessible, or “blacked out”, on Wednesday or posting messages to encourage visitors to contact Congress about SOPA.

It appears their bold effort worked.

By the end of Wednesday, at least three lawmakers withdrew their support for the legislation – Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) withdrew as a co-sponsor of the Protect IP Act (PIPA) in the Senate and Reps. Lee Terry (R-Neb.) and Ben Quayle (R-Ariz.) withdrew from SOPA, which is the House version of the bill. A few more may be added to that list this morning.

Google reports that at least 4.5 million people signed their online anti-SOPA petition during the protest. Even the White House received nearly 104,000 signatures on a We the People petition calling for President Obama to block passage of bills like SOPA and PIPA.

It is still too early for SOPA protesters to get excited, as support remains for PIPA and SOPA in the Senate and House, respectively. However, the success of the SOPA blackout protest thus far demonstrates how understanding your audience and using what they value to make them take action can spur policy change.

Internet users are constituents, and removing their access to content or interrupting their Web routines with SOPA and PIPA protest notices compelled them to get involved in the protest in their own way. It just goes to show that reaching your audiences where they are is an effective way for communicators to raise awareness and encourage action on an issue. Plus, it doesn’t hurt your cause if you get support from an opinion leader like Facebook Founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

While time will tell if signatures to online petitions and increased calls and emails to Capitol Hill on Wednesday changed the outcome of the January 24 vote in favor of SOPA and PIPA protesters, it is already evident that the reach and response to yesterday’s Internet blackout will definitely impact it.

While I may not be able to foresee  the future, my media savvy crystal ball is suggesting that Monday, January 23, 2012, will be a dark day for communicators.

If you haven’t heard the troubling news already, Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Paypal and other major Internet mainstays will be staging a “blackout” on January [...]]]>

While I may not be able to foresee  the future, my media savvy crystal ball is suggesting that Monday, January 23, 2012, will be a dark day for communicators.

If you haven’t heard the troubling news already, Google, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Paypal and other major Internet mainstays will be staging a “blackout” on January 23 to protest proposed federal legislation that will make them liable for lawsuits for content posted on their websites.

Congress is considering a new bill – called the Protect IP Act or Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) – which would allow companies to sue websites for posting protected content without permission and force them to go dark. For example, if I posted a video on YouTube of my friend dancing at a party with our favorite Adele song playing in the background, the record company could sue YouTube and force them to close their whole website for my infraction. There will be a hearing on Tuesday, January 24, to consider this legislation, hence the January 23 protest that could endure for a few hours or an entire day.

For communicators, the uncertainty of the blackout compels us to find and plan for alternative ways to do our online-heavy tasks on January 23. It is rare for a public relations activity to have less than one Internet-related tactic, so, word to the wise: Avoid scheduling events or releases for January 23. It is likely to be a day when our world is narrowed to those we can communicate with in traditional ways so that protesters can enlighten us about our dependence on the World Wide Web and social media.

UPDATE 1/17/12 12:15 P.M. – Wikipedia and Reddit announced that they will blackout their sites on Wednesday, January 18 to protest SOPA. Be prepared as other websites may follow suit. However, it may be unnecessary now. Due to White House pressure over the weekend, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa announced this morning (on his website, ironically) that his committee is postponing a hearing on SOPA, essentially shelving the legislation and postponing a vote on the House floor on the bill. Time will tell if communicators need to be concerned about Internet blackout protests actually occurring since the bill seems to be old news now.

UPDATE 1/18/12 9:20 A.M. – Wikipedia and Reddit kept to their threat to go dark for 24 hours today in protest of SOPA, but other big Internet sites, such as Facebook, Twitter and AOL, have declined to participate. Google is just placing copy on their homepage today asking users to contact Congress about the bill. Looks like a widespread Internet blackout as predicted earlier this week will not materialize after all. However, the potential blackout did raise a lot of  interesting questions for communicators and Internet users.

This weekend people around the world will gather to celebrate one of the biggest events of the year, New Year’s Eve. To wrap up our InSites for the Future series, Vanguard’s event manager Scott LaLonde looks at the future of event planning.

2012 Will Set A New Standard for Green/Sustainable Events

Source: Convention Industry Council

Associations, government [...]]]>

This weekend people around the world will gather to celebrate one of the biggest events of the year, New Year’s Eve. To wrap up our InSites for the Future series, Vanguard’s event manager Scott LaLonde looks at the future of event planning.

2012 Will Set A New Standard for Green/Sustainable Events

Source: Convention Industry Council

Associations, government organizations and nonprofits that pride themselves on hosting “green” events may have an eye-opening 2012. The event industry’s first-ever guidelines for environmentally sustainable events are in the final stages of creation and will be rolled out in the new year. The guidelines, created through a partnership of the Convention Industry Council, ASTM Standards (formerly known as the American Society for Testing and Materials), Green Meeting Industry Council and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will set new standards and criteria measuring the environmental impact of event components, including venue, food and beverage, transportation, audio/visual production and accommodations. Given the potential for media and communicators to scrutinize the legitimacy of  “green” events, those who want to promote sustainable events in 2012 and beyond will need to evaluate their plans using these new standards.

– By Scott LaLonde

Getting your message across has always been a challenge, but the shortened attention spans of audiences today make it even more difficult. Andrew Overton looks at how being persistent can help to spread your message, while Helen Mitternight looks at the importance of the messenger.

Source: JMR Photography

Long Term Engagement Is Key to [...]]]>

Getting your message across has always been a challenge, but the shortened attention spans of audiences today make it even more difficult. Andrew Overton looks at how being persistent can help to spread your message, while Helen Mitternight looks at the importance of the messenger.

Source: JMR Photography

Long Term Engagement Is Key to Moving the Needle

In the digital age, it’s no secret that attention spans have shortened. Retweets and Facebook shares aren’t enough to alter public opinion. It’s critical that audiences remain engaged over the long term if there is any hope of changing attitudes and policy. As communicators, going viral is a big deal, but we can’t end the conversation just as it is getting started. Imagine if the Occupy Wall Street protestors only spent one week in Zuccotti Park. Income inequality would never have become part of the national conversation.  Maintaining a conversation isn’t easy, but the burden lies on us to be innovative and persistent.

– By Andrew Overton

The Message Becomes The Messenger

In 2012, social marketing will become much more about “social” and much less about “marketing.” With the rise of social media and citizen journalists, people will care much more about who is delivering their messages than what the message is. For social marketers, this will increase the urgency of finding the right primary audiences to help push messages out to secondary audiences. The old adage, “the message is the medium” will become “the message is the messenger.”

– By Helen Mitternight

Today we look at the public relations workplace and the culture changes that could be ahead in 2012. We start off with a look from Mary Pat King at how CEOs and executives should maximize the involvement of PR professionals on staff. Rachael Siefert discusses a mentoring role reversal, and Vanguard’s vice president of [...]]]>

Today we look at the public relations workplace and the culture changes that could be ahead in 2012. We start off with a look from Mary Pat King at how CEOs and executives should maximize the involvement of PR professionals on staff. Rachael Siefert discusses a mentoring role reversal, and Vanguard’s vice president of operations, Tracy Ferrell, looks at how HR will begin to use social media in the hiring process.

More CEOs Depend on PR Executives as Chief Strategists for Organizational Management and Growth

As the theorists in the public relations industry work to gain consensus about the new definition of public relations, 2012 will see more professionals positioning themselves in the C-suite by demonstrating through regular reporting of evaluation metrics that PR communications strategies and tactics have a measurable impact on perception, as well as behaviors, purchasing decisions and brand commitment. Like our colleagues in marketing, the investment in public relations strategies — especially social media and grassroots engagement — will have tangible benefits.  For nonprofits, this translates into more voices promoting the educational messages of the organization, more participants benefiting from the organization’s mission, more advocates for the cause and ultimately more donor dollars.

– Mary Pat King

The Student Becomes the Teacher

Source: Masternewmedia.org

New professionals often seek out mentors who can guide them through their first few years in the workplace. In the coming years, those same entry level professionals may become mentors themselves. Recent graduates have an edge when it comes to new technology and social media because they have been using these tools in their personal lives for years. In 2012 and beyond, new professionals will be looked to more than ever for their social media and new technology expertise, and it won’t be uncommon to find them training a room full of executives on the benefits and use of Twitter, Pinterest or the latest must-have tool.

– Rachael Siefert

Increasing HR Use of Social Media Tools

In 2011, HR professionals were slow to adopt social media tools because of privacy concerns. In 2012, these professionals will more willingly adopt them as part of the job candidate search. Increased demand for social media skills, combined with the need for improved candidate response time and reduction in search costs will necessitate this evolution. HR departments will also begin to incorporate social media tools on intranets to improve internal innovation, mentoring and training.

– Tracy Ferrell

Source: Shantanu Gautam

Social media is an ever-evolving world, and communicators are working overtime to keep up with the changes. Gary Ritterstein predicts that a platform to integrate all social media will be the next big thing, while Scott Rieder looks ahead to a time when all media outlets use Twitter for breaking news. [...]]]>

Source: Shantanu Gautam

Social media is an ever-evolving world, and communicators are working overtime to keep up with the changes. Gary Ritterstein predicts that a platform to integrate all social media will be the next big thing, while Scott Rieder looks ahead to a time when all media outlets use Twitter for breaking news. Finally, Stephanie Dukes looks at how people will use social media specifically to spread the word about third party candidates.

Social Media Deck

Just as Google is using its new Plus platform to integrate its online tools, 2012 will be the year that at least one site will take the stage to bring everything together. With more platforms than ever, looking ever more familiar with each new iteration, it only makes sense to have a one-stop shop where you can follow news and friends, update your status or share content. Microsoft’s recently leaked “Tulalip” appears to be the first of its kind where “search meets share,” complete with a Facebook and Twitter login. This sort of Tweet Deck-type site could help communicators, both professionally and personally, better manage our online brand. As we attempt to find a unique role for each new platform, it’s only a matter of time before our new homepage is one page that does it all.

– By Gary Ritterstein

Extra! Extra! Tweet All About It!

Think about some of the most significant breaking news items of the past year – Osama Bin Laden’s death, the Royal Wedding and presidential campaign announcements. What do all of these items have in common? They were all announced via Twitter, becoming instant, breaking news to millions of people around the world.

Breaking news via Twitter is overtaking traditional news channels to adapt to a 21st century digital news cycle, and this will continue in 2012. Just as paper boys on the street corner and nightly news radio were replaced by television broadcast news, social media is now the best place to get news as it happens. With media outlets catching on as well (CNN’s Breaking News handle, @cnnbrk, has over 5 million followers), 2012 will be the year that every media outlet uses Twitter to report breaking news. As such, communicators will be even more engaged in the 24/7 breaking news cycle to stay on top of the social issues that affect us most.

– By Scott Rieder

Social Media: The Third Party Platform

“There is no way to have all the people’s ideas fit into two parties.”

That was the opinion of one respondent to Lab42.com’s survey “The Political Agenda.” The survey asked social media users a variety of questions about top issues, candidates and political news sources. Roughly half of the social media users surveyed said that they’ve posted political content on their Facebook pages.

From the 2008 election to anti-Mubarak demonstrations in Cairo to Occupy Wall Street, social media is now a powerful tool to galvanize instantaneous political action. In 2012, American voters who feel that neither Democrats nor Republicans speak for them will make significant use of social media to spread the word about third party candidates for election. There seems to be fertile ground for their efforts, with 59 percent of the survey’s respondents saying they would support an independent or third party candidate for president. Next year, keep a close watch on how Libertarians, Green Party members and others further develop their social media strategies to boost candidates who have historically had a difficult time reaching a broad cross-section of voters.

– By Stephanie Dukes

Today, as part of Vanguard’s “InSites for the Future” series, we’re looking at the future of multicultural communication. Vanguard’s multicultural services leader, Leah Holmes-Bonilla, predicts that cultural relevancy will become even more critical in a fast-paced world, while Kirana Bammarito sees that multicultural approaches will expand from a PR specialty service to an essential [...]]]>

Today, as part of Vanguard’s “InSites for the Future” series, we’re looking at the future of multicultural communication. Vanguard’s multicultural services leader, Leah Holmes-Bonilla, predicts that cultural relevancy will become even more critical in a fast-paced world, while Kirana Bammarito sees that multicultural approaches will expand from a PR specialty service to an essential ingredient in all aspects of communication.

Keeping Pace with Culturally Relevant Communications

“Everyone here has the sense that right now is one of those moments when we are influencing the future.” – Steve Jobs

Social media has facilitated unprecedented social change – from the Arab Spring to Occupy Wall Street and beyond. The lightning speed and mobility with which social change can happen will only accelerate in 2012.  But with great speed will come great responsibility to ensure communications are culturally relevant and personal. Effective communication happens between people who trust each other, so social change will happen most successfully in spheres that are responsible, competent and real. Beyond providing accurate information, communicators will find it critical to be culturally responsive in order to remain a credible resource. A piece of advice for communicators in 2012: Never be afraid to listen to and learn from your audience. If you don’t, they will tell you and many others in their social network, exactly what they think. And you may not like the results.

– By Leah Holmes-Bonilla

Multicultural Communications Will No Longer Be a Specialty – It Will Be Expected

Source: Staff reports. The Washington Post.

More and more public relations agencies are listing multicultural communications as one of their specialties, but eventually this will be a standard service not a niche one. In 2012, I predict that communications agencies will be expected to incorporate multicultural needs into all their services, much like clients have come to expect social media expertise. Demographics are shifting, and communicators must adapt to the change. The U.S. is quickly approaching complete majority-minority status, meaning that non-Hispanic Whites will no longer comprise the majority of the population. Washington, D.C., along with seven other major cities, achieved this status in 2000. Beyond racial, ethnic and linguistic cultural competence, savvy communicators will apply a broad definition of culture to include LGBTQI, youth, seniors and any other audience segment that requires tailored attention. Successful public relations in 2012 means understanding that one size no longer fits all.

– By Kirana Bammarito

Source: Roland Tiangco photograph on CultureHall.com

Vanguard will celebrate its 25th anniversary in 2012. We’re proud of our accomplishments, but we’re also excited about what the future holds for social change communications. Through the end of the year we will be sharing our predictions for 2012 and beyond under the title, “InSites for the [...]]]>

Source: Roland Tiangco photograph on CultureHall.com

Vanguard will celebrate its 25th anniversary in 2012. We’re proud of our accomplishments, but we’re also excited about what the future holds for social change communications. Through the end of the year we will be sharing our predictions for 2012 and beyond under the title, “InSites for the Future.”

We’re kicking off our predictions with a look at the future of multicultural communication later today. What else will we be discussing? Check out our schedule below:

Monday, Dec. 19 – Multicultural Communication in 2012

Tuesday, Dec. 20 – The Future of Social Media

Wednesday, Dec. 21 – The Use of Visuals in Communication in 2012

Thursday, Dec. 22 – The PR Workplace of Tomorrow

Friday, Dec. 23 – Persistence and Audience Are Key to Messaging in 2012

Tuesday, Dec. 27 – Keeping People Interested and Engaged in 2012

Wednesday, Dec. 28 – Strategic Online Experts of Tomorrow

Thursday, Dec. 29 – Opportunities for Non-Profit/Corporate Partnerships to Grow in 2012

Friday, Dec. 30 – 2012 Will Set A New Standard for Green/Sustainable Events

Only time will tell whether the predictions we make come true, but in the meantime we welcome your own predictions and thoughts in the comment fields!

Late last week, a headline from our local “Patch” news service caught my attention – Police: Group of Teens Cause $1,500 in Damage at General’s Ridge Golf Course. I opened the story expecting to find names and ages attached to the accusation, but there were none. In fact, other than a description that the [...]]]>

Late last week, a headline from our local “Patch” news service caught my attention – Police: Group of Teens Cause $1,500 in Damage at General’s Ridge Golf Course. I opened the story expecting to find names and ages attached to the accusation, but there were none. In fact, other than a description that the individuals were shirtless and had a dog with them, there were no other details that had been confirmed. The perpetrators haven’t yet been identified or caught. So how do we know they are teenagers? They could be 20 years old – or 40. For that matter, how do we even know the dog was a German Shepherd? Yet these details were reported as fact. Is there any danger in assigning an age label to crime suspects when they haven’t yet been caught, let alone accused? Would it have been just as acceptable to report their race or religion?

It’s been quite a few years since I matriculated from Penn State with a journalism degree, but I still remember the endless days of sitting in class picking apart real headlines and leads for any sign of bias. Not only did we look at our own work, we examined the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. Sometimes it seemed impossible to find ethics issues in products from such venerated media outlets, but we dug until we did. Now I don’t have to look far at all for instances of ethical breaches and bias, and I often feel very alone in my need to pay attention to such details. Does the rest of the world just accept this new era of “anything goes” reporting?

A recent after-work viewing of Page One: Inside The New York Times cemented the nagging feeling that it’s not  just newspapers that are disappearing, it’s the care and commitment to accurate, factual reporting that they represent. From All the President’s Men to The Paper, our culture has tried to emphasize the importance of getting it right, even at the expense of getting it second. Now those films, and that sentiment, seem naive and nostalgic. I mean, we’re all reporters, right? I can post whatever I want on Facebook or Twitter, and it can be seen around the world in a matter of minutes. Of course, if we could count on each other for accurate, first-person accounts, it would mean that Natalie Portman, George Clooney and even William Hung are all dead – because Twitter said so.

This month, the practice of journalism was further rocked by allegations that NewsCorps-owned outlets invaded the voicemail accounts of several British citizens, including a young murder victim and relatives of fallen soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is plenty of outrage around the situation, but will it finally wake up the public enough to demand a return to the ethics and standards that were once a hallmark of reporting?

The irony is not lost on me that I am writing this piece as a public relations professional rather than a currently working journalist. Like so many of my wide-eyed fellow journalism graduates, my picture of traveling the world to uncover scandal and save lives was far from the reality of fast-food wages and hours spent rewriting stories on a local fight over back lit awnings. However, I’ve never set aside those basic journalism ethics in my PR work. As a communicator for social change, I often have an opportunity to pass along critical information that can help reporters investigate their own stories. I know it’s in my and my clients’ best interests for those journalists to be fair, accurate and unbiased – even if the results are not as flattering as I would like. I know that once the line is breached – whether or not it’s on behalf of my cause – it’s hard to cross back to the other side.

Join our Page One Blog Party